Bougainvillea Manor

How Mental Health and Substance Abuse Treatments Reduce Recidivism

Reducing recidivism rates among offenders can be achieved through the implementation of mental health and substance abuse treatments. These treatments address underlying issues that contribute to criminal behavior and provide individuals with the support they need to reintegrate successfully into society.

Managing mental health disorders is essential in reducing the likelihood of recidivism. Through counseling, therapy, and medication management, treatment programs can effectively treat mental health disorders such as depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which can go untreated in prison, making it challenging for offenders to integrate effectively into society.

In this section, we will explore how mental health and substance abuse treatments play a crucial role in reducing recidivism rates, backed by research and evidence.

The Impact of Untreated Mental Health Disorders on Recidivism

Untreated mental health disorders are prevalent among individuals within the criminal justice system. However, limited access to mental health treatment within prisons often leaves offenders without the necessary care, increasing their risk of reoffending. By addressing mental health disorders through counseling, therapy, and medication management, treatment programs can effectively reduce the likelihood of recidivism.

Studies have shown that untreated mental health and substance abuse disorders are a significant contributor to recidivism rates. According to reports from the Bureau of Justice Statistics, nearly half of state prison inmates and over half of federal prison inmates have previously been diagnosed with mental health disorders. However, the limited access to mental health treatment within prisons has left many offenders without the care they need, increasing the risk of recidivism.

One study published in the Journal of Criminal Justice found that treatment for mental health disorders could reduce the risk of reoffending by as much as 31%. Treatment can help offenders manage many other problems, such as substance abuse and interpersonal relationships, which are crucial factors in reducing recidivism rates.

The Role of Substance Abuse Treatment in Recidivism Reduction

Substance abuse is another factor that contributes to recidivism rates. Reports from the National Institute on Drug Abuse indicate that close to two-thirds of inmates in state prisons display signs of substance abuse or addiction. A vast majority of individuals with substance abuse disorders are likely to commit criminal offenses to acquire drugs or engage in illegal activities when under the influence.

Substance abuse treatment programs have proven to be effective in mitigating the chances of recidivism. Treatment plans such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, 12-step programs, and medication-assisted therapies can help individuals manage their substance abuse disorders, lowering their risk of reoffending. Research shows that individuals who undergo substance abuse treatment programs are at a lower risk of reoffending. According to the Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, individuals who complete substance abuse treatment have a 46% lower risk of reoffending than those who do not. Furthermore, treatment can improve offenders’ holistic health, reduce drug-related crimes, and help them integrate into society better.

The Power of Integrated Treatment

Integrated treatment plans that address both mental health and substance abuse disorders simultaneously have shown greater efficacy in reducing recidivism rates. Since a significant number of individuals with mental health problems also struggle with substance abuse, treating both disorders simultaneously is crucial. Integrated treatment programs provide a comprehensive approach to managing these co-occurring disorders, leading to better outcomes. Research published in the Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment found that participants in integrated treatment programs had a 30% reduction in reoffending after six months compared to those in traditional treatment programs. By addressing both mental health and substance abuse disorders together, integrated treatment programs offer a more holistic and effective approach to reducing recidivism rates.


In conclusion, providing mental health and substance abuse treatments is essential in preventing recidivism among offenders. By addressing the underlying issues that contribute to criminal behavior, these treatments offer individuals the support, tools, and resources they need to break free from the cycle of reoffending. Implementing comprehensive and integrated treatment programs not only improves offenders’ well-being but also promotes safer communities and a more productive society. Investing in mental health and substance abuse treatments is a critical step toward reducing recidivism rates and ensuring a brighter future for individuals involved in the criminal justice system.


Sources Cited

  • James, D. J., & Glaze, L. E. (2006). Mental Health Problems of Prison and Jail Inmates. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
  • Skeem, J. L., Manchak, S. M., & Peterson, J. K. (2011). Correctional Policy for Offenders with Mental Illness: Creating a New Paradigm for Recidivism Reduction. Law and Human Behavior, 35(2), 110–126.
  • Treatment for Drug-Abusing Offenders in the Criminal Justice System. (2012). National Institute on Drug Abuse.
  • Inciardi, J. A., Martin, S. S., & Butzin, C. A. (2004). Five-Year Outcomes of Therapeutic Community Treatment of Drug-Involved Offenders after Release from Prison. Crime & Delinquency, 50(1), 88–107.
  • Coviello, D. M., Cornish, J. W., Lynch, K. G., Boney, T. Y., & Maher, K. J. (2017). A Cluster Randomized Trial of Comprehensive Opioid-Related Substance Abuse Intervention in Community Correctional Officers. Addiction, 112(9), 1572–1581.
  • Hunter, B. A., & Jason, L. A. (2013). An Investigation of Integrated Substance Abuse Treatment and Transitional Housing. Journal of Dual Diagnosis, 9(1), 29–34.
  • Lattimore, P. K., Cao, Y., & Visher, C. A. (2010). How Effective is Correctional Education, and Where Do We Go from Here? The Results of a Comprehensive Evaluation. Journal of Correctional Education, 61(4), 339–365.
  • Haque, M., & Day, A. (2014). Combined Offender Rehabilitation Effectiveness: A Systematic Review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(6), 550–563.
  • Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P., & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does Correctional Treatment Work? A Clinically Relevant and Psychologically Informed Meta-Analysis. Criminology, 28(3), 369–404

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *